Avontuurlijk klim & klauter parcours!

Tennis Match Repairing Issues Continue To Make Headlines

Tennis <span id="more-9765"></span>Match Repairing Issues Continue To Make Headlines

Few would accuse anyone of match repairing at Wimbledon, but many state that the practice is widespread among lower-ranked players at smaller events.

Tennis is faced with accusations of match fixing for years: from the match that is infamous Nikolay Davydenko and Martin Vassallo Arguello in 2007 that first introduced much of the public to questions about the integrity of matches in some smaller tournaments to suspensions levied against two players earlier this year, here always seems to be something lurking beneath the sport’s surface.

Those concerns were aired once more this week in a tale by The Daily Beast, which again attempted to delve through the information out there about tennis and figure out simply how much of an issue match fixing is for the activity.

One 2014 study cited in that story estimated that one percent of all tournament that is first-round might be fixed, which would mean more than 20 matches per year were affected by gamblers; other estimates and guesses have suggested that numerous matches each week could be fixed, though that’s still a very small percentage of all professional tennis matches.

Low Pay Leads to Temptation for Lower-Ranked Players

What makes tennis therefore susceptible to match fixing?

There are certainly a mix of factors, lots of which help explain why the problem seems most prominent at the lower levels associated with the ranks that are professional.

First, there’s the obvious reality that tennis (at least in singles play) is a sport that is individual.

There is only one individual which should be bribed to get them to throw a match (equivalent issue that leads many to fear widespread integrity issues in boxing and other combat sports), and there are no teammates or substitutes to pick up the slack for the player whom is struggling.

Having said that, nobody is accusing Roger Federer and Rafael Nadal of fixing matches at Wimbledon.

For just one, there’s the fact that these matches have a rigorous quantity of scrutiny on them; perhaps even more importantly, though, star tennis players are excessively well paid, meaning it might price anybody attempting to fix a match at that degree an excessive amount of cash, if maybe it’s done at all.

That is not to say that nobody tries. Even Novak Djokovic has told a tale of being offered $100,000 to fix a match back 2006.

But players casino-online-australia.net on the Challenger Tour or other low-ranked competitors aren’t making nearly that much money, and may even lose money in a provided tournament after travel and mentoring expenses are taken into account.

That makes them prime targets for gamblers looking to fix a match.

Spot Betting Allows Fixing Without Impacting Match Result

Another problem is the very fact that gamblers do not even have to correct a match that is entire find techniques to benefit.

Because many gambling web sites and bookmakers provide betting on sets or also individual games, players can achieve agreements to allow certain occasions to happen during the right times to satisfy gamblers while still playing to win overall.

‘One particular typical fix would be to separate the very first two sets up to a predetermined script, then have fun with the 3rd set fairly to figure out which player advances,’ sports modeler Ian Dorward told Slate earlier this year.

The Tennis Integrity device may be the physical body tasked with rooting out such issues, and they have actually often made examples of players. In March, Elie Rousset and Walkter Trusendi each received six-month suspensions and fines for violations of anti-corruption guidelines, though maybe not for match-fixing.

But no matter what the Integrity Unit does, it’s unlikely in order to change the tradition enabling lower-ranked players to be incentivized to aid gamblers who want to make sure bets.

That would need a change that is complete how compensation works up and down the various amounts of expert tennis, something that probably will not happen any time soon.

New Jersey Online DDoS Attacks on Regulated Web Sites Arrive with Bitcoin Ransom Notes

Recent nj-new Jersey DDoS assaults on unnamed regulated sites had been along with a ransom note future that is promising more serious attacks should companies not comply. (Image: rodin.com.au)

DDoS (distributed denial of service) is not a truth that any online gaming business ever desires to cope with, but some regulated brand New Jersey sites had to do just that the other day.

New Jersey’s fledgling online gambling industry has been targeted, apparently for the very first time, by these distributed attacks.

Late week that is last at least four unnamed web sites were derailed by a hacker, or hackers, who flooded the web sites’ bandwidths with traffic, rendering them inoperable, and ultimately taking them offline for around half an hour.

The assaults had been combined with a ransom note for a sum that is undisclosed payable in Bitcoin, with a risk of a far more serious attack to follow.

Maybe Not New, But Irritating

DDoS attacks are nothing new for the gambling that is online, of course. In fact, they’re as old as the industry itself, but there are suggestions that incidents of the actions that are unwelcome been growing. Some experts even claim that attacks across all industries that are online doubled in 2014.

High-profile operators on the receiving end a year ago included Betfair, which was targeted on Grand National time, the UK horse race that is biggest meet of this year with regards to betting.

Attackers usually time their efforts to coincide with large sports in the hope that operators will simply pay up as opposed to lose company. PokerStars, Unibet, and state that is swedish monopoly Svenska Spel may also be all recent victims.

Chances of Prosecution Slim

Despite the initial interruption, it appears that the situation is currently stable and has now been effortlessly dealt with by the nj-new Jersey market’s cybersecurity teams. The battle between online gambling sites therefore the hackers is one of mouse and cat, of strategy and counterstrategy: as safety technology improves, so do the hackers’ efforts to breach it.

New Jersey Division of Gaming Enforcement President David Rebuck said this week that the matter was now being investigated by state authorities, the FBI, and the New Jersey Office of Homeland Security and Preparedness, as well as his very own organization. The different agencies, he said, were hunting a ‘known actor’ that has ‘done this before.’

Chances of prosecution are slim, but. Up to now, only two guys have been convicted for launching DDoS attacks. Those were two UK-based Poles whom made the mistake of threatening an operator they knew personally and agreeing to meet up with him in a resort room. The operator, of course, brought law enforcement with him. In 2013, the pair that is hapless sentenced to 5 years in prison by way of a court in the united kingdom.

LVS Attack

Such attacks are not limited to online gambling, needless to say. In February 2014, Las Vegas Sands Corporation (LVS), owned by anti-online curmudgeon Sheldon Adelson, had been subjected to a massive cyber attack that was believed to have emanated from Iran. On February 10, LVS was plunged into chaos as computers began flatlining and servers shutting down. Hard drives were cleaned clean as malware ripped through the business’s networks.

The decision was taken to sever the multibillion dollar operation completely from the Internet as hackers began compressing and downloading batches of sensitive files, comprising everything from high-roller credit checks to details of global computer systems.

The attack caused an estimated $20 million well worth of damage. The attackers subsequently claimed their DDoS actions had been been prompted after hearing remarks made by Adelson in 2013 about ‘dropping the bomb’ on Iran.

NY Casino License Bidding Process Receives One Applicant

Tiago Downs, the sole bidder for the 4th NY casino license, proposes an improved expansion package having unsuccessful to impress last December. (Image: weny.com)

Regulators in New York State have slim pickings if they come to determine in the winner associated with 4th Upstate casino license in the economically deprived Southern Tier region.

Just one contender submitted a proposition for Monday’s deadline, while a rival pulled down at the last moment.

The Tioga Downs racino in Nichols is the one and only applicant for the certain area, having a $195 million expansion proposition to its present center.

The proposal that is aborted from businessman Jeffrey C. Hyman, was pulled having been dealt ‘a fatal blow’ by the state’s Department of Environmental Conservation.

Hyman said his project could have been ‘seismic,’ that might have been what the environmental everyone was complaining about in the first place, specially when you consider it has an ongoing debate about fracking within the area.


Unfortunately, Jeff Gural, owner of Tioga Downs, failed to wow the Gaming Control Board at the original licensing hearing with their project in December 2014, although he has since come up with an improved package.

In the past, the board recommended three casino licenses, for Monticello, in the Catskills; Schenectady; and the Finger Lakes area, snubbing the Southern Tier and Tioga Downs entirely, despite having been given the powers to suggest a license that is fourth.

Gural was furious during the decision and highly critical of the board. He argued that a casino in the Southern Tier would be perfectly rational, as the closest competitor is Mohegan Sun at Pocono Downs, 90 miles south in Wilkes-Barre, Pennsylvania

‘It’s got nothing to do with me, I have enough money,’ he fumed. ‘But the individuals of the Southern Tier?’

‘And what really pisses me off,’ he continued, warming to their theme, ‘is the governor asked me personally to spend $800,000 of my cash to pass Local Law 1, Proposition One [on the expansion of casino gaming]. What was that all about? I mean… the whole thing is sickening to tell the truth with you.’


Such had been the outcry among locals, in fact, that Governor Andrew Cuomo intervened, requesting that the Gaming Commission reconsider.

‘As this could be the last license issued in New York State, it might excite national competition by interested parties that distribute even better applications than 1st round,’ suggested Cuomo. ‘ in the event that you agree to the request, the [casino board] should quickly establish a procedure for the fourth license that could be complete as expeditiously as possible, as the Southern Tier needs jobs and investment now.’

The board complied, a decision it would likely now be sorry for, itself facing a ‘bidding war’ of one and under political pressure to award a license to a man who has recently been highly critical of its decision making processes as it finds.

Reacties zijn gesloten.